Design Verification vs. Design Validation For Medical Devices: What’s the Difference?
What is Design Verification?
Design Verification refers to the process where you confirm through examination and evidence that the final design of your product meets the requirements of the intended consumer. During design verification, the goal is to ensure that your design inputs match your design outputs. Verification not only demonstrates that the product will do what it’s supposed to do, but that it does it in the way the design anticipates. In addition, developers will confirm if the design complies with the necessary requirements, applicable regulations, specifications, and conditions set forth in the design plans and assembly instructions.
Design Verification Example
Let’s imagine we’re building a portable oxygen concentrator. This device extracts oxygen from the surrounding air and turns it into condensed oxygen for the patient to breathe. During Design Verification, the following questions can be asked to define specific product requirements:
- How long does the battery need to last?
- How does the device need to be charged?
- What is the maximum amount of oxygen that can be taken in by the patient?
- What conditions will the patient encounter while they are mobile?
- What regulatory standards need to be met?
What is Design Validation?
Design Validation is a testing process by which you prove that the device you’ve built works for the user as intended. The FDA states that design validation is “establishing by objective evidence that device specifications conform with user needs and intended use(s).” Design Validation is performed to provide evidence that the process consistently produces a result that meets its predetermined specifications. While completing the medical device design validation process, it is important to test the built device in a real-world setting to account for all the possible complications and further ensure that the user needs are met.
Design Validation Example
Returning to our portable oxygen concentrator example, first, we must define our user needs. We know that the patient wants to be able to move around with ease while using the oxygen concentrator. Specifically, the user wants to be able to use the device in all areas of travel, such as air travel. A user need, for example might look like the following:
- User Need: The oxygen concentrator is suitable for portable use in an airplane.
- Validation Test Suite: Test that the oxygen concentrator can be moved around easily with the user in a smaller space with 20 different patients
- Validation Test Suite: Test that the oxygen concentrator operates within its specifications while moving up and down small aisles, compact rooms (airplane bathrooms), and different levels of altitudes
Summary of Differences: Design Verification vs Validation
Design Verification and Validation (DV&V) answer two different questions. Design Verification answers: Did you design the device right? While Design Validation answers: Did you design the right device?
Validation differs from verification in that validation focuses on performing specific tests to demonstrate that the device works for the end user properly. While verification focuses on verifying device specifications and confirming that the specific requirements of the design correlate properly to its functionality and usability.
What Are Some Best Practices for Medical Device Verification and Validation?
When writing your design inputs for design verification, it is important to keep in mind the following:
- Define the conditions that are most suitable for your device, and how they might change.
- It is critical to ask what your device needs to do and what it needs to go through to achieve its purpose for the patient.
- Make your design inputs are as clear and actionable as possible.
- Ensure that your design inputs are testable, it is important to examine how you will verify each input later in the development process.
The following best practices should be involved in nearly every design validation process:
- The design validation process must include initial production units, the device must be able to be built in the intended production environment, with the exact drawings and specifications.
- Include accurate labeling and packing specifications for use.
- Design validation requires clinical evaluation. The device should be tested in either simulated or actual use by the intended end-user.
- Use and test the medical device under its specific and intended environmental conditions.
Design Verification and Design Validation Capabilities at Gilero
DV&V is a crucial part in Gilero’s Design & Engineering process. During Phase 4 of our design process, our engineers can help you improve your project by determining appropriate manufacturing equipment and fixturing, developing process parameter settings, generating assembly work instructions, and identifying critical inspections based on the output of risk analysis. Design verification and validation protocols will be written based on the requirements, acceptance criteria and test methods developed in the earlier phases. Your device will be tested in accordance with these protocols, and it is important to ensure that the products we are producing and testing are in the same environment and under the same conditions as would be done in normal production to prevent further risk. After performing DV&V testing, updates to risk documentation might be considered to account for any residual risk. At the conclusion of this phase, a traceability matrix is generated to demonstrate that the design outputs align with the design input.
Ready to turn your idea for a medical or drug delivery device into a reality?
Talk with an expert today.